<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ACTA non-event</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/the-acta-non-event/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/the-acta-non-event/</link>
	<description>A dwarf, standing on the shoulders of Giants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/the-acta-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/?p=263#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Too true. The interesting bit is that it can be shown to exist since May last year, despite all the denials. Still, we knew that. Did they really expect us to believe that they&#039;d start a multi-government negotiation without even a strawman document?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true. The interesting bit is that it can be shown to exist since May last year, despite all the denials. Still, we knew that. Did they really expect us to believe that they&#8217;d start a multi-government negotiation without even a strawman document?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glyn Moody</title>
		<link>http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/the-acta-non-event/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tracs.co.nz/gripping-hand/?p=263#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link.  As you probably saw, I&#039;ve just written another post saying essentially the same as you: that the &quot;new&quot; drafts on Wikileaks contain nothing new, and reinforce the impression that they could release the current ACTA draft without revealing anything too shocking (unless the Internet section has something really awful.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.  As you probably saw, I&#8217;ve just written another post saying essentially the same as you: that the &#8220;new&#8221; drafts on Wikileaks contain nothing new, and reinforce the impression that they could release the current ACTA draft without revealing anything too shocking (unless the Internet section has something really awful.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
